2016年7月20日 星期三

社会契约须遵循

我国反对党的逐渐强大足以给执政的国阵政府对抗和塑造两线制的趋势应是国民欣庆之事,但从最近发生的事件,反对党的对策和反应举动的确让期待有健全政治体系的国民感到心寒和失望!

一般上,同样性质的事情发生后的看法和决定无论对象是谁原原本本应是一致的;但我们今天从已不时吴下阿蒙的反对党所看到的,所听到的,所读到的却是相对性,疑义性的自圆其说的决定!这根本就与反对党阵营在弱势尚未成长前的高谈的言论和宣传有很大的出入。以行动党为首的槟州的民联政府的举动更是活生生的讽刺性的例子!

高谈宽论要言论自由,争取不受干扰,要废除印刷法令的行动党执政槟州后,至今天就不曾停止对以“实”论事,“实事”报道的报章,报馆展开干扰和诉讼举动。执政槟州近八年的任期,林冠英对报馆采取的诉讼举动的案件数次与前国阵比较是记录性也让人难以置信的!最近,林冠英对英文“星报”专栏评论员陈宝珠采取法律诉讼是其中之一的例子。这是我们今天可见证在还未成为槟州首席部长前,林冠英所公开谈的所谓“言论自由”的另一类演绎!

被控上法庭,应不应辞职以示“问责”不是见仁见智各自演绎来合理化自己的不应辞职的理由而是本身是否言行一致,持有双重标准来衡量同样事物!担任高职而被控上法庭的官员不能因没有法律的必要条件和需要,不须辞职;但还有社会契约的存在而须遵循。首长,部长是公众人物,一举一动都是受关注的。有鉴于此,塑造好榜样乃是必须的!担任官职被控上法庭不辞职不应受鼓励以免滋养不良风气。但民联政府开了先例,往后我国人民也许会看到首长和部长被控上法庭后,以“政治迫害”为由不辞官职!官职的崇高性,威严性也因为有了被控上法庭不辞职者的在位受损!

Cosplay______4

Cosplay_____(3)

2016年7月12日 星期二

2016年7月10日 星期日

When patriotism becomes missing!

To many Malaysians who have keen concerns on the national security and welfare of people, it is undisputable that the role and existence of our opposition political parties in recent years have become questionable and disillusioned. Noticeably, their reciprocal actions on the attacks by foreign elements in our country have casted much doubts and discounted confidence.

Our opposition parties have been campaigning freedom, fairness and rights of the rakyat and also fighting for welfare for the people. The fundamental bases of freedom, enjoyment of rights and welfare of people depend much on the stability and security of our country. However, when there was a so-called bomb explosion initiated by foreign elements in Puchong and also the intrusion of Lahad Datu, Sabah by Suluks , the actions exhibited by our opposition have been disgusting. Their actions clearly not only show the total lack of patriotism but also demonstration of irresponsible parliamentarians. Instead of calling for unity of our people to fight against the intruders and terrorism, these elected law-makers tried to make mockery of our security.

There have been street demonstrations organized by the unscrupulous politicians to protest against the ruling party for the so-called unfairness and curbed freedom of an individual politician and also corruption charges against the opposition, however, when the foreign elements openly declared attack on the integrity and dignity of our country, our opposition acted dumbly and blindly without any organized protest that would help to show our solidarity against those who threatened the security of our country. As shown in the past, organizing demonstration by the oppositions should not be a problem. Generally, most of the people just wonder when the street demonstration is strongly needed against the foreign elements, no such assembly is being organized. The simple conclusion may be that individualism has prevailed over patriotism and our people have now become divided to the ease of foreign threats.